Post-meeting analysis that surfaces possible reasoning gaps, pressure language, bias, and consent issues — as questions for your group, never as verdicts.
It reads a transcript and flags what may have shaped the conversation. Advisory only.
“TRACE surfaces possible patterns in a conversation — reasoning gaps, pressure, consent issues — as questions for human review. It is advisory only. It never declares intent, never judges people, and always defers to the humans in the room.”
Four steps. About a minute of your time; the engine does the reading.
Paste any text transcript with speaker names labeled — Zoom export, .doc, or plain text.
The engine reads the whole conversation against the pattern libraries and glossary.
It flags F, CD, and SC patterns speaker by speaker — each one a question, never a verdict.
Read it in-app or download the .docx. Every flag has a glossary entry for depth.
Paste a transcript and see what TRACE surfaces — advisory patterns you review as a group.
Every flag is a possible pattern for review, never a verdict about a person.
Reasoning and clarity issues: logical fallacies, cognitive biases, evidence-quality gaps.
Clear vs. unclear.
Coercion, pressure, dominance, extraction, and consent erosion — often structural, not personal.
Coercive vs. non-coercive.
The healthy counterparts: clear, non-coercive, consent-preserving moves — what a better version looks like.
Points the way forward.
Bring one difficult conversation. See what TRACE surfaces — then decide, as humans, what it means.
Start a runAdvisory only. TRACE never judges people or declares intent; the interpretation belongs to your group.